A Small-C Conservative Case for Kamala Harris

A veteran political journalist offers a conservative perspective on why Kamala Harris is a viable presidential candidate. He highlights the importance of civic order, stability, and unity in a diverse democracy, especially as the country has struggled with disunity during the Trump era. Harris’s traditional respect for institutions and a shift away from identity politics guide this endorsement.

In a rather unconventional take, a seasoned political journalist argues for supporting Vice President Kamala Harris in the next presidential race. The author’s experiences in war-torn Beirut have shaped his understanding of the fragility of civilization. Harris symbolizes the stability and mutual respect needed to protect democracy, especially during this tumultuous Trump era. This conservative support for Harris stresses the importance of maintaining civic order and prioritizing unity over division.

Harris’s appeal, the author argues, isn’t just about rejecting the chaos brought on by the current Republican Party. Rather, it stems from her approach to Democratic policies, showcasing a shift away from identity politics and an embrace of a more optimistic and stable governance style. The author encapsulates her platform with three significant words: stability, unity, and optimism, arguing these are crucial for moving forward in American politics.

Looking back at history, the author cites Ronald Reagan, who claimed, “Government is the problem,” during his inaugural speech in 1981. However, he contends that government is crucial for preventing the excesses of capitalism and protecting citizens’ rights. The military, serving as a model for civic responsibility, places collective welfare above personal ambition — something the author feels was disregarded during Trump’s presidency.

The former president has come under scrutiny for dismissing military service members, allegedly referring to them as “suckers” and “losers,” according to John Kelly, his former chief of staff. This attitude, the author insists, indicates a dangerous disconnect from the principles essential for a functioning democracy. He emphasizes that Harris, with her legal training and respect for institutions, could foster the respect and order necessary for America’s progress.

In wrapping up, it seems the journalist makes a compelling argument for Kamala Harris from a conservative perspective. He emphasizes the need for stability and civic order, especially in the face of division that has been more pronounced under Trump’s presidency. Harris’s move away from divisive identity politics, combined with her respect for democratic institutions, makes her a candidate worthy of conservative support as the nation strides toward the future.

Original Source: www.nytimes.com