Trump 2.0: The Rise of an ‘Anti-elite’ Elite in US Politics

Trump’s recent rise has been marked by surrounding himself with loyal politicians, creating a distinct form of elitism in opposition to traditional Democratic elites. Despite claims to dismantle entrenched power structures, his administration’s agenda indicates a solidified power base directed by loyalty rather than a true populist reformation. Some experts describe this situation as a ‘revolt of the elites,’ prompting concerns about the future structure of American governance.

President Donald Trump has recently surrounded himself with a new group of politicians and officials, marking what some are calling a shift in the political landscape. While Trump campaigned on the promise to dismantle what he termed the ‘corrupt elites’, his new administration seems to have elevated a particular type of elite. This new cohort mainly comprises individuals loyal to Trump himself, raising questions about what constitutes elitism.

When focusing on Trump’s controversial statements about annexing places like Canada and Greenland, and tech mogul Elon Musk’s ties to far-right groups across the Atlantic, the media seems to overlook a significant agenda. This agenda aims to reshape the federal government through the lens of Trump’s inner circle, who firmly align against Democratic elites and their policies while holding considerable power within the executive and legislative branches until at least 2026.

This political project is less about dismantling elitism entirely, but instead attacking a specific elite tied to liberal democracies. There’s a clear narrative unfolding showing how the Trump administration positions itself as champions of the common man, fighting against an elite that allegedly betrays their interests. Political theorist John Higley points out that this populism roots in the complex dynamics between powerful leaders and the elites who benefit from them, potentially threatening the foundation of Western democracies.

Since the 1940s, there’s been a general consensus in US politics about the necessity of democratic elitism, suggesting that elites are an unavoidable part of mass democracies. This elitism is meant to respect electoral outcomes and maintain political institution autonomy. But since the 1990s, and especially after the 2016 election, challenges to this consensus have mounted, fueled by rampant polarization.

High-profile politicians across party lines have used anti-elitist rhetoric to gain traction, highlighting a widespread disdain for the ‘Establishment’ power bases on the coasts of the U.S. This has been exacerbated by Trump’s persistent claims of election fraud and rising tensions in political discourse.

The idea of the ‘revolt of the elites’ isn’t fresh; it’s been discussed by historians and theorists who argue that contemporary populism is emerging not from the disenfranchised masses, but from those already in power. Scholars like Arjun Appadurai argue that today’s populist movements represent a backlash where elite figures, rather than average citizens, challenge the previous democratic norm. Moreover, the narrative shifted with Trump’s victory that displaced the once-dominant Democratic elites, leading to the emergence of a new elite.

This so-called “alter elite” aims to replace both liberal Democrats and moderate Republicans, openly discrediting their established values. This indicates a significant shift in how American politics may be configured going forward, suggesting that the effects could be deeper and more lasting compared to Trump’s first term.

Another intriguing concept is the idea of a “Muskoligarchy,” suggesting an economic elite led by figures like Musk aligned with tech tycoons and wealthy individuals, potentially transforming governmental efficiency. This notion captures a mix of oligarchic power dynamics and political maneuvering that has caught attention in discussions around contemporary governance.

Yet, some analysts cautioned against assuming the emergence of a unified “Muskoligarchy”. They point out the chaotic alliances formed by the new Trumpian elite. Their connection primarily stems from unwavering loyalty to Trump, rather than a cohesive ideology. But despite their differences, a common goal emerges: to eradicate the perceived Democratic “insider” influence over government.

The rise of this new ‘anti-elite’ elite under Trump marks a notable shift in U.S. politics. While they proudly declare themselves against the established elite, they appear to be reinforcing a distinct kind of elitism based on unwavering loyalty to Trump. With the backing of conservative institutions and a disruptor mindset, their agenda could reshape American democracy. This shift raises critical questions about the future of democratic elitism, revealing cracks in the established framework of American political life that could impact governance moving forward.

Original Source: theconversation.com