cat 1
cat 2
cat 3
cat 4
ALBANY, ALBANY COUNTY, CAPITOL, CIVIL RIGHTS, CLAIRE VALDEZ, DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, DEMOCRATS, DONALD TRUMP, KATHY HOCHUL, LEGISLATION, MARCEL, MARCELA MITAYNES, NEW YORK, NEW YORK FOR, NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION, NORTH AMERICA, POLITICS, PROTEST, PROTESTS, QUEENS DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN, UNITED STATES
Nia Okafor
0 Comments
Immigration Protesters Block Albany Traffic as New York for All Passage Looks Grim
Immigration protesters blocked traffic in Albany, voicing their support for the “New York For All” bill amid doubts among Democrats about its passage. Advocates condemned increased ICE actions, while some lawmakers expressed fear about political ramifications. No arrests were made during the protest, which aimed to challenge the current administration’s immigration policies.
Traffic in Albany came to a standstill on Tuesday when dozens of immigration rights advocates, joining forces with five Democratic Socialist assemblywomen, protested outside the state Capitol. The protest specifically aimed at generating support for the “New York For All” bill, which has recently faced skepticism from the majority of Democrats in the Legislature regarding its potential to expand sanctuary policies statewide.
The group, led by the New York Immigration Coalition, gathered to express their opposition against increased deportation efforts spearheaded by President Donald Trump and ICE. Demonstrators shut down the intersection of Washington Avenue and North Hawk Street as they chanted and carried banners, voicing concerns that the bill might not advance through both legislative houses before the current session wraps up.
Assemblywoman Marcela Mitaynes noted, “Our neighbors are frightened. We’re seeing the numbers drop in school attendance. Our businesses are starting to get concerned about their workforce.” The urgency of their message was compounded by recent reports of heightened ICE activities across New York, including incidents near schools.
As the demonstration unfolded, lawmakers were reportedly debating the expanding of anti-ICE initiatives amidst fears of political repercussions as the election season draws closer. Assemblywoman Claire Valdez voiced frustrations about the hesitation surrounding the issue, suggesting that managing basic political fears often overshadowed the very real concerns of constituents.
State police were on site monitoring the situation but refrained from making any arrests. Garbage trucks were utilized by the city of Albany to help manage the blockade. Albany police had jurisdiction over the area but did not intervene to disperse the crowds, illustrating a restrained approach toward the protest.
In response to the situation, Deputy Chief of Staff Alyson Baker stated that Albany’s mayor did not call for arrests because they were exercising their right to protest. She emphasized the city’s commitment to balancing public safety with protest rights.
Assemblywomen involved in the protest, such as Phara Souffrant Forrest and Sarahana Shrestha, made clear they were prepared for possible detainment, asserting that localities shouldn’t shoulder the financial burden of ICE’s actions. Shrestha pointed out that many localities struggle to meet basic service needs like running emergency services.
The protest comes against a backdrop of national Republican leaders pledging to increase deportations and reduce spending tied to resources for undocumented immigrants. Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie expressed his understanding that immigration issues lie mostly within the federal framework, showing skepticism about state-level influence.
Support for “New York For All” remains robust in some sectors, particularly among labor unions fearing the negative impact of ICE on workforce stability. Assembly sponsor Karines Reyes defended her bill, clarifying that it does not restrict police from enforcing the law. Instead, it aims to prevent state resources from being utilized for enforcing federal deportation policies, asserting, “We’re not handcuffing law enforcement by any means.”
Reyes committed to further advocating for a compromise on the issues, asserting that the proposed policy is essential for New York to counteract the current administration’s immigration directives. “History will look back at this time and people will find themselves either on the right side or wrong side of the issue,” said Reyes, highlighting the moral implications tied to the political debate.
The protest against expanding immigration policies in New York gained traction as Democrats hesitated to fully support the “New York For All” bill, amidst fears of political fallout in an election year. Advocates continue to voice their concerns over increased ICE activities, while lawmakers face a challenging balancing act between public opinion and political safety. The outcome of this bill remains uncertain as discussions continue and the legislative deadline approaches.
Original Source: spectrumlocalnews.com
Post Comment